Neoliberalism
تحليل وآراء
الأربعاء، ٢٦ أبريل ٢٠٢٣
By Dr. Nabil Tomeh for TID
Member of Parliament/Syrian Arab Republic
I came from the concept of rational “liberty”, and I mean here that it is conditioned by the existence of the other, this first, and secondly, after the emergence of societies and states, there were limits that any transgression by the other would be considered an assault, which means that we need to possess the concepts of spiritual and material freedom, which developed into the concept Freedom, not from the domination of authoritarian political thought in the world of the North and the West in particular over the world of the South and even over its societies, but rather to liberation from immoral and negative thought of the true spiritual and social, to find that the beneficiaries of this title: “Neoliberalism” are a few of The population of the world, as for the vast majority of it, brought them nothing but more suffering, pain, and hidden dependence under the name of spreading Western democracy and its principles that are based on the enslavement of humanity under the illusion of freedom and the development of its ideas.
And when we review what the democracy of the Northwest world has presented to the world since the resurrection of the New World until the present moment, we find that it has presented political, military, economic and religious wars, through systematic terrorism that uses the language of visual dazzling and continues to develop ideas that are destructive to the intellectual structure, and to all societies of the world without exception, relying on its dissemination on media Information technology that is developing at a tremendous speed, and injecting an accumulation of information that serves his ideas, and the goal is to continue plundering peoples’ wealth and ideas and subjecting them to hegemonic policies in the form of modernity they want.
Let us ask, early on: is there an old liberalism? I say yes, those that relied on political philosophy, dating back to perceptions developed by the German thinker “Immanuel Kant” in the eighteenth century, the owner of the German idealist school, and his idea that moral liberation is an essential matter for human beings, and after that he responded to it: a founding “structure” The dialectical school of the principle of moral life, despite Kant’s assertion that the human being is an end, not a means, and we also listen to the opinions of John Stuart Mill, Mazzini Giuseppe, Dor Wilson and John Maine Keynes, and all of these They called for the liberalization of opening borders and developing a capital network that must be based on “supra-national” thought and the spread of trade and special liberal values, which, in their belief, lead to the achievement of prosperity for states and peoples, and for all actors in the international system and within the system that controls it. The idea is to reach globalization, i.e. to transform the world into a small village, and then to reach and develop liberalism, leading to what they are proposing now, and this shows us the beginnings of the struggle over moral formation and immoral formation, between the East, which was later embodied in the Soviet Union, and then the Russian Federation. , and the West that established all concepts that end human morality, in the interest of scientific and western money, and this conflict was with the resurrection of the new world, which was based on the power of money at the expense of morals, as it started from the resurrection of the United States of America in 1715, up to the printing of the dollar in 1776 , passing through the secular revolutions, starting with the French Revolution in 1778, up to what Trump leaked during his ascension to the presidency of the United States of America, when a relationship occurs between the spiritual world represented by the entire world of the East and the South, and the material world represented in Western Europe and the United States of America.
Britain colonized a third of the world, influenced the second third, and excelled in building underdevelopment in the entire Third World system, even among the peoples of the First World. An economic system that began to roll around and rule the world more than thirty years ago, and calls for the release of individual freedom and reducing the role of governments in the economy, and encourages the removal of controls on the movement of capital, that is, its privatization and anti-union organizations, as it takes the form of a “free economy” Ideas presented in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, as I mentioned, to appear clearly and publicly at the Paris meeting in 1938, with the participation of founders among its creators, the Austrian philosophers “Ludwig von Mises” and “Friedrich Hayek”, believing that social democracy and the historical development of the welfare state in Britain are similar to Nazism, And each of them issued a book that was considered the basis for the new thought.
A dangerous struggle is taking place between the followers of the old liberalism embodied by the conservatives in both Europe and America, the “Republican Party,” and the new liberalism that the American Democratic Party insists on spreading and enhancing the chances of conflict in the world, of course, “they are two sides of one thought and one coin,” and we see them rushing to support LGBTQ communities. Homosexuality”, enacting laws that support them, and penetrating the moral systems on which religions are based by strengthening the individual language, by presenting its own slogans and trying to generalize it, and the follower now has to check what we are talking about, by imposing its slogans in sports stadiums, leagues, international competitions and the global media , which is controlled by America and global Zionism, and although the idea is present in the secrets of all societies, Arab or otherwise in all continents, and is a fighter against man-made laws and heavenly laws, they insist on turning it into a real reality, basing this on the era of the Prophet Lot, which ended In the era of the Prophet Abraham, and what we are witnessing today of calls to return to the Abrahamic in the region of the Middle East, is nothing but a prelude accompanying the legalization of these matters, and thus the final control over this region and this nation, because it is considered the cradle of civilizations and the cradle of religions, and thus their goal is to return to the culture of the ego, Which cancels the language of tolerance, and promotes the language of ascending even on the bodies of others.
Through this, the researcher finds that neo-liberalism considers citizens to be consumers, rewards merit, punishes incompetence, and transcends democracy whose course he disagrees with, which is beginning to crack.
Neoliberalism
I came from the concept of rational “liberty”, and I mean here that it is conditioned by the existence of the other, this first, and secondly, after the emergence of societies and states, there were limits that any transgression by the other would be considered an assault, which means that we need to possess the concepts of spiritual and material freedom, which developed into the concept Freedom, not from the domination of authoritarian political thought in the world of the North and the West in particular over the world of the South and even over its societies, but rather to liberation from immoral and negative thought of the true spiritual and social, to find that the beneficiaries of this title: “Neoliberalism” are a few of The population of the world, as for the vast majority of it, brought them nothing but more suffering, pain, and hidden dependence under the name of spreading Western democracy and its principles that are based on the enslavement of humanity under the illusion of freedom and the development of its ideas.
And when we review what the democracy of the Northwest world has presented to the world since the resurrection of the New World until the present moment, we find that it has presented political, military, economic and religious wars, through systematic terrorism that uses the language of visual dazzling and continues to develop ideas that are destructive to the intellectual structure, and to all societies of the world without exception, relying on its dissemination on media Information technology that is developing at a tremendous speed, and injecting an accumulation of information that serves his ideas, and the goal is to continue plundering peoples’ wealth and ideas and subjecting them to hegemonic policies in the form of modernity they want.
Let us ask, early on: is there an old liberalism? I say yes, those that relied on political philosophy, dating back to perceptions developed by the German thinker “Immanuel Kant” in the eighteenth century, the owner of the German idealist school, and his idea that moral liberation is an essential matter for human beings, and after that he responded to it: a founding “structure” The dialectical school of the principle of moral life, despite Kant’s assertion that the human being is an end, not a means, and we also listen to the opinions of John Stuart Mill, Mazzini Giuseppe, Dor Wilson and John Maine Keynes, and all of these They called for the liberalization of opening borders and developing a capital network that must be based on “supra-national” thought and the spread of trade and special liberal values, which, in their belief, lead to the achievement of prosperity for states and peoples, and for all actors in the international system and within the system that controls it. The idea is to reach globalization, i.e. to transform the world into a small village, and then to reach and develop liberalism, leading to what they are proposing now, and this shows us the beginnings of the struggle over moral formation and immoral formation, between the East, which was later embodied in the Soviet Union, and then the Russian Federation. , and the West that established all concepts that end human morality, in the interest of scientific and western money, and this conflict was with the resurrection of the new world, which was based on the power of money at the expense of morals, as it started from the resurrection of the United States of America in 1715, up to the printing of the dollar in 1776 , passing through the secular revolutions, starting with the French Revolution in 1778, up to what Trump leaked during his ascension to the presidency of the United States of America, when a relationship occurs between the spiritual world represented by the entire world of the East and the South, and the material world represented in Western Europe and the United States of America.
Britain colonized a third of the world, influenced the second third, and excelled in building underdevelopment in the entire Third World system, even among the peoples of the First World. An economic system that began to roll around and rule the world more than thirty years ago, and calls for the release of individual freedom and reducing the role of governments in the economy, and encourages the removal of controls on the movement of capital, that is, its privatization and anti-union organizations, as it takes the form of a “free economy” Ideas presented in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, as I mentioned, to appear clearly and publicly at the Paris meeting in 1938, with the participation of founders among its creators, the Austrian philosophers “Ludwig von Mises” and “Friedrich Hayek”, believing that social democracy and the historical development of the welfare state in Britain are similar to Nazism, And each of them issued a book that was considered the basis for the new thought.
A dangerous struggle is taking place between the followers of the old liberalism embodied by the conservatives in both Europe and America, the “Republican Party,” and the new liberalism that the American Democratic Party insists on spreading and enhancing the chances of conflict in the world, of course, “they are two sides of one thought and one coin,” and we see them rushing to support LGBTQ communities. Homosexuality”, enacting laws that support them, and penetrating the moral systems on which religions are based by strengthening the individual language, by presenting its own slogans and trying to generalize it, and the follower now has to check what we are talking about, by imposing its slogans in sports stadiums, leagues, international competitions and the global media , which is controlled by America and global Zionism, and although the idea is present in the secrets of all societies, Arab or otherwise in all continents, and is a fighter against man-made laws and heavenly laws, they insist on turning it into a real reality, basing this on the era of the Prophet Lot, which ended In the era of the Prophet Abraham, and what we are witnessing today of calls to return to the Abrahamic in the region of the Middle East, is nothing but a prelude accompanying the legalization of these matters, and thus the final control over this region and this nation, because it is considered the cradle of civilizations and the cradle of religions, and thus their goal is to return to the culture of the ego, Which cancels the language of tolerance, and promotes the language of ascending even on the bodies of others.
Through this, the researcher finds that neo-liberalism considers citizens to be consumers, rewards merit, punishes incompetence, and transcends democracy whose course he disagrees with, which is beginning to crack.